Amid all the bickering, indecision, name-calling and back-pedaling on previous decisions, there was a notation regarding a vote on a motion to fence off a section line. The vote was tallied with Hull also casting a vote.
It has been our impression that the Chairman only votes to break a tie and this clearly was NOT a tie vote.
Common sense (and South Dakota law) says that section lines are not to be closed if only ONE person objects, and that article stated there were several objections.
It will be even more interesting to see what write-up is published on this same meeting in 2 weeks won't it?